Monday, October 5, 2009
Debrief from Emporia State presentation
Saturday went much smoother. It was a unique experience for me, presenting without any audience feedback. I never knew what the response was. So, it was gratifying to receive these two emails from Rob, the instructor:
That was really an incredible presentation. The students were very interested in your topic and talked about it quite a bit afterward. Two students in particular were looking forward to this topic (the others didn't understand the Semantic web initially) and were disappointed that the opportunity to hear you "almost" eluded them on Friday. We were so glad you accommodated us.
You weren't aware, but the Library and Information Management Dean happened to pay an unannounced visit to the class just before your presentation. She stayed and watched. Off microphone she was telling the students that your information/presentation was perhaps one of the most important things they could learn in the entire course, and even the foundation for other courses. Thought you would be interested.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Me a guest lecturer?
I'll post how that goes later.
SIDLIT Evaluation
I did finally get the feedback for my presentations a SIDLIT. Only 6 people completed the survey. I was encouraged by the informal responses I received at the conference, however. I had one attendee approach me to tell me that she had no idea what Web 3.0 was about and had just about reached her limit of "seat time" when the presentation began. She said that she really enjoyed the presentation and felt she had learned a lot.
One of the technical support team at JCCC told me that he was pretty savvy about the semantic web but learned a few things and thought I did a good job of presenting a complex subject so that it was easily understood. This informal feedback, where people go out of their way, is exciting for me.
EventName The Semantic Web (Web 3.0) - The Platform, Promise & Potential
Jim Van Horn
Excellent
3
Good
3
Fair
0
Weak
0
Friday, June 26, 2009
Trying to get Scholarly Activity Funds
It has become a catch-22. The instructions state that the application must be submitted 10 working days before the trip, but the manager, Dr. Geiger, is not available to receive the application or approve the travel.
Marcia suggested I submit my expenses retroactively and just see if it will be approved. Since I am travelling at my own expense I really do hope that it gets approved.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
SIDLIT Acceptance
Dear Jim Van Horn,
We have reviewed the proposals submitted for the 2009 SIDLIT conference and are pleased to tell you that your proposal "PowerPoint 201: Beyond the Basics" has been accepted for the program as a concurrent session to be held at Johnson County Community College in the Regnier Center on July 30 - July 31, 2009.
We have reviewed the proposals submitted for the 2009 SIDLIT conference and are pleased to tell you that your proposal "The Semantic Web (Web 3.0) - The Platform, Promise & Potential" has been accepted for the program as a concurrent session to be held at Johnson County Community College in the Regnier Center on July 30 - July 31, 2009.
I will need to apply updates to the Semantic Web presentaion as there seems to be a major news release almost weekly.
The PowerPoint session will be a hands-on session so I need to plan the whole lesson and decide if I want to create a CD with an initial vanilla presentation. Various features of added to improve the presentation.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Results from TechNet Conference
| Excellent | Very Good | Average | Poor | Rating Average | Response Count | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Semantic Web | 100.0% (2) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 0.0% (0) | 1.00 | 2 |
Molly
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Downloading Webcasts
Friday, April 10, 2009
SIDLIT
- Web 1.0 was the first decade of the web (1990 - 1999)
- Web 2.0 was the second decade of the web (2000 - 2009)
- Web 1.0 was the first decade of the web (2010 - 2019)
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Nice Email Regarding My C2C Presentation
Jim,
I very much appreciated your presentation last Friday at the C2C States hook-up. I thought your explanation was the clearest I had ever seen about all that is available on the web. Your graphics were clean and clear and I hope you will be able to make copies of them available to us. It seemed to me that there was more to that set of graphics than you could get aired Friday morning, so I would appreciate if you could send the complete folder. I am the newest of neophytes in this business and I am fascinated by all that can be used successfully.
I sent her the handout that I created which was an outline of the presentation including links to all the applications and additional information. I also attached a copy of the PPT, although it really needs narration to make a lot of sense.
Friday, April 3, 2009
Post Video Conference Reflection
As with most first-time adventures, the VC was not without its glitches. The other sites were all using VC classrooms and PolyComm equipment. Mike Jeffries had the additional challenge of setting up a "mobile" site in the Union using a differnt vendor's product - LifeSize. We experienced a video dropout when switching back and forth between the PC to the camera. Another challenge was with the backlight coming from the windows causing the automatic feature of the camera to average the light input and create a very dark picture. Since most of the really important information came from the PowerPoint presentation on the PC, it was not a big issue.
Barb Carder from Extended Campus suggested that I submit my presentation for the Missouri Distance Learning Association (MODLA) Conference. It's too late for this year, but maybe next.
I am really glad that I used links to the various slides rather that just creating a sequential presentation. I provided more flexibility. As time was short, I was able to eliminate some of the non-essential slides without have to "click through" them. However, they asked me to email the presentation to share with the participants and I'm not sure they will be able to effectively navigate through the slides. I'll work on the presentation a little before I send it.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Checking out the equipment
I might do some more work on the slides to ensure that the text on some of the captured images is large enough to be read.
Monday, March 30, 2009
Evaluation From TechNet
Updating My Presentation for Video Conference
I spent about 4 hours on Saturday updating my slides.
I discovered an interesting feature with Adobe Reader. I added a link in my PPT to a PDF on my hard drive -"Microformats Cheat Sheet". In order to make it readable for the presentation I needed to "Zoom" to 200% or more. Adobe Reader "remembers" the changes that you make to the zoom setting and using [Alt] + the left or right arrow key you can return to the previous view or proceed to the next view. I'm going to try it out and if I become comfortable with it I will use this feature in my presentation on Friday.
Later this week Mike is going to do an equipment check with the other campuses that are hosting the VC. I hope to be able to use that time to test my media to be sure that everything works the way I have planned
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Ready Set Go
I received tentative approval to begin working on my Ed Tech Internship under option 2 - Conference Presentation. I will need to begin collecting all my thoughts and artifacts related to my presentations this Spring.
The bulk of my work was in creating the Semantic Web presentation for the TechNet conference on March 12th. This presentation was different than the usual "How To" workshops because the semantic web is still developing. I had presented a paper in October of 2007 at the AACE E-Learn International Conference and wanted to leverage that information in my new presentation.
Some of the challenges that I foresaw were:
- Presenting a very technical topic to a semi-technical audience
- Creating interest in an evolving technology that is not fully implemented
- Since this was my first time to attend the TechNet conference, knowing what to expect in the level of web skills from the attendees
- Creating a "take-away" document that would provide sufficient structure and references even though my PowerPoint presentation would not be in outline/bulleted format
In addition, I wanted to utilize some of the principles and techniques for effective presentations that I had been reading about in Gar Reynold's and Nancy Duarte's books (Presentation Zen and Slide:ology)
- Minimize/eliminate bullet-points
- Use slide transitions that aid in unifying the presentation
- Consider the effects of color selection
- Only use 80% of the allotted time - no one ever complained because the speaker went to short.
- Recapture the audience's attention every 10 minutes
